Democrats have gotten too clever for themselves in battling voter ID. Requiring people to show the same ID to vote that they must show to buy cigarettes or beer somehow disenfranchises them according to those great super-duper thinkers on the Left. It’s comical. And the British business wire service, Reuters, bought into the liberal line so much that it inadvertently makes Barack Obama seem like one big crook.From Reuters: “The new laws – many of which include measures requiring voters to show a photo ID at the polls — could carve into Obama’s potential support in Florida, Ohio and a few other politically divided states likely to be crucial in the November 6 election, analysts say. The analysts note that massive registration drives in 2008 helped put millions of people aged 18 to 29 on voting rolls, and that age group — which makes up roughly one-quarter of the U.S. electorate — helped propel Obama to victory, voting 2-to-1 for him. Rock the Vote, a nationwide organization that mobilizes young voters, said the new laws would make it more difficult for the group to educate people on how to sign up to vote.”Might I suggest that if you are too ignorant to figure out how to sign up to vote, you really are not intelligent enough to vote? Getting a driver’s license is much more difficult.
I completely agree with the last paragraph. If you don't care enough or aren't smart enough to obtain photo ID and get yourself to the polls, it's a good bet you aren't informed enough to cast an intelligent vote. Stay home.
***David Axelrod: Idiot.
***Iran to build copy of US spy drone. This is completely Barack Obama's fault. We should have gone in there and got that as soon as we found out it was there.
***I know, I know, every time you pick up a magazine or turn on the TV there's somebody there telling you how to lose weight. Virtually every women's magazine in the checkout aisle has a headline like "Walk Off the Weight!" or "Lose 23 lbs. by Summer!". I came across this article while surfing the web, though, and there is some good stuff here. 10 Reasons You're Not Losing Weight.
***News organizations gone crazy! Objective journalism is just about dead in this country.
I wrote here about MSNBC’s campaign to tie the Koch brothers to George Zimmerman’s shooting of Trayvon Martin. That effort was, it is fair to say, insane, but it apparently inspired one or more liberals to take MSNBC’s theories a step farther. Someone wrote–I think it was on Facebook–that Koch Industries had paid for Zimmerman’s legal defense and/or put up his bail money. Other liberals happily repeated the claim, to the point where Snopes deemed it a rumor worth addressing.
The claim is not only false, but entirely baseless and, in fact, stupid. There is no connection whatsoever between Koch Industries or the Koch brothers and George Zimmerman. None. Further, while the Koch brothers have championed a number of libertarian causes, gun rights have not been among them. In the one instance where Koch Industries is known to have lobbied on a firearms issue, it was against a proposed liberalization of firearms laws in Florida. And the brothers have no history of participating in the defense of criminal defendants. Further, while this is not my area of expertise, I doubt whether it would even be legal for Koch Industries to pay for an unrelated person’s criminal defense. So the assertion that Koch Industries is paying for Zimmerman’s defense or contributing to his bail lacks the remotest shred of plausibility.
They're just making stuff up now.
*** HUNGRY, I AM. FEED ME, YOU WILL.
***Obama's machine spending $60 million to defeat Scott Walker.
***George Zimmerman released on $150,000 bond. I hope somebody is protecting him.
***Where's Hugo? Who cares?
***Now cheerleaders are Tebowing? Gotta kinda wonder about the sincerity here, y'know?
*** I SOWWY....
***Feminists now targeting...LEGOs. Sheesh.
Yes, I can certainly see the reason for the outrage. That little girl is incredibly oversexed, don't you think?
***Excellence is more fun than mediocrity
***Have a great day!